Prosthetic Rehabilitation of An Acquired Maxillary Defect with Definitive Obturator Prosthesis- A Clinical Technique

Muhammad Waseem Ullah Khan                              BDS, FCPS

Sabiha Naeem                                                                 BDS

Qudsia Iqbal                                                                    BDS

Resection of maxilla creates oro-nasal communication which gravely compromises different functions like speech, swallowing, mastication and esthetics. Reconstruction of the maxillary defect generally require a multidisciplinary approach, but prosthodontic rehabilitation is the most practical, convenient and cost-effective mode of treatment along with the added advantage of oncological surveillance. This clinical technique describes a method of prosthodontic management of an Aramany’s class II type of maxillary defect with a definitive obturator prosthesis having a cast partial framework for a patient who underwent maxillary resection one year back as treatment for Pleomorphic adenoma.
KEYWORDS: Maxillectomy, Obturator, Prosthesis
HOW TO CITE: Khan MWU, Naeem S, Iqbal Q. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an acquired maxillary defect with definitive obturator prosthesis- A clinical technique. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):100-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.100
Received: 09 August 2019, Accepted: 15 February 2020

INTRODUCTION

Maxillofacial defects result in facial disfigurement, impaired functions and have a great impact on patient’s quality of life. They face hyper-nasality, masticatory dysfunction & communication between oral and nasal cavities which leads to fluid leakage through nasal passage. These functional problems may lead the patient to emotional stress, anxiety, depression and social phobia.1,2,3
There lies a great dilemma either to rehabilitate the maxillary defects surgically or prosthodontically.4,5 The cardinal benefit of prosthodontic rehabilitation is to achieve oncological surveillance as it is easy to remove the obturator and examine the surgical site for detecting tumor recurrence. Prosthetic obturator is a simplified non-surgical approach
for the patient to rehabilitate the function of speech, deglutition, mastication, normal oro-facial appearance and it improves the quality of life.4-7 This clinical technique describes the prosthodontic management after the local excision of pleomorphic adenoma on the right side of the palate with the fabrication of a definitive palatal obturator.

CLINICAL TECHNIQUE

A 65-year-old male patient reported to the Prosthodontic department of Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore, for the replacement of his interim obturator. The patient’s medical history revealed that he was type II diabetic and hypertensive. The patient had under gone local excision (Aramany’s class II type of palatal resection on the right side), one year back for the treatment of pleomorphic adenoma (Fig.1). Rehabilitation of the defect with obturator as a hollow bulb, having cast metal framework was decided. Designing

Fig 1: Intra oral view

Fig 2: Design pattern drawn for lab instructions

of the definitive prosthesis was finalized as shown in fig: 2. Major connector was extended up to the palatal surfaces of remaining present natural teeth to achieve the effect of bracing/stabilization. Additional support was added through full palatal coverage. Primary impressions were made with irreversible hydrocolloid. After planning on the surveyed cast mouth preparations were completed. Final impressions were made by two-step technique in which rubber based polyvinyl siloxane putty was used having wash impression of polyvinyl siloxane light body impression material on it.

Fig 3: Master cast

Fig 4: Maxillary obturator inserted

Impressions were poured in type-IV model stone. The subsequent laboratory steps were performed as per standard protocol. Metal framework try-in was done in patient’s mouth

Fig 5: Front occlusal view

and the bite was registered in the same appointment. Using jaw-relation record master-casts were mounted on semiadjustable articulator with arbitrary method. The try-in of the prosthesis was done after teeth setup. After flasking and dewaxing, curing of the prosthesis was done with heat cure acrylic in two steps. Roof of the defect was cured with the part of prosthesis containing teeth and size of bulb was approximated by adapting the modelling wax as a lid over of cast. This lid of modelling wax was cured separately with heat cure acrylic resin. Heat cured acrylic lid was attached to the roof of the defect with autopolymerising resin and a hollow bulb obturator was fabricated.
Finishing and polishing of obturator was done. Definitive obturator was inserted in patient’s mouth. Post-insertion
instructions were given and follow up appointments were scheduled for the patient. In follow-up appointments, patient was comfortable and satisfied with mastication, deglutition, esthetics and phonetics of the obturator. No complications were reported by the patient. Obturator can be made light weight by incorporating a hollow bulb in it which was done in this case. As obturator maintains its intimate contact superiorly and laterally with the soft tissue, its degree of movement is decreased.8 Hollow bulb obturator prevents the overburden on the remaining structures and provide structural durability and prevents resonance to speech.9,10

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared

REFERENCES

  1. Singh M, Bhushan A, Kumar N, Chand S. Obturator prostheses for hemi-maxillectomy patients. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2013;4:117-20. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.117814
  2. Jaykumar, kandarphale M.B, Anand V, Mohan J, Kalaignan P. Definitive obturator for maxillary defect J Integ Dent 2017;21-4.
  3. Khan MW, Shah AA, Fatima A. Single-Step Fabrication of a New Maxillary Obturator Prosthesis. J Dent Oral Disord Ther 2015;3:1-4. https://doi.org/10.15226/jdodt.2015.00136
  4. Chen C, Ren W, Gao L, Cheng Z, Zhang L, Li S, Zhi PK. Function of obturator prosthesis after Maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. Braz J otorhinolaryngol 2016;8:177-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.10.006
  5. Kreeft AM, Krap M, Wismeijer D, Speksnijder CM, Smeele LE, Bosch SD, Muijen MS, Balm AJ. Oral function
    after maxillectomy and reconstruction with an obturator. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41;1387-392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2012.07.014
  6. Khan MW, Shah AA, Fatima AL, Hanif A. Subjective assessment of obturator functioning in patients with hemimaxillectomy. Pak J Med Health Sci 2014;8:694-97.
  7. Srivastava N, Goyal P. Palatal obturator: An update EC Dent Sci 2017;9:124-27.
  8. Naveen YG, Sethuraman R, Prajapati P. Definitive maxillary obturator prosthesis. Int J Prosthet Dent 2011;2:22-6
  9. Fernandez T, Rodrigues SV, Vijaynand KR. A titanium cast hollow definitive obturator prosthesis for a maxillary patient. Int J Prosthodont Rest Dent 2016;6:69-72. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1159
  10. Srivastava N. A two-piece sectional definitive obturator: a clinical report. J Dent Heath Oral Disord Ther 2016;4:00132. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdhodt.2016.04.00132

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
  2. FCPS Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
  3. FCPS Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
    Corresponding author: “Dr. Sabiha Naeem” < cute_sabi85@yahoo.com >

Prosthetic Rehabilitation of An Acquired Maxillary Defect with Definitive Obturator Prosthesis- A Clinical Technique

Muhammad Waseem Ullah Khan                              BDS, FCPS

Sabiha Naeem                                                                 BDS

Qudsia Iqbal                                                                    BDS

Resection of maxilla creates oro-nasal communication which gravely compromises different functions like speech, swallowing, mastication and esthetics. Reconstruction of the maxillary defect generally require a multidisciplinary approach, but prosthodontic rehabilitation is the most practical, convenient and cost-effective mode of treatment along with the added advantage of oncological surveillance. This clinical technique describes a method of prosthodontic management of an Aramany’s class II type of maxillary defect with a definitive obturator prosthesis having a cast partial framework for a patient who underwent maxillary resection one year back as treatment for Pleomorphic adenoma.
KEYWORDS: Maxillectomy, Obturator, Prosthesis
HOW TO CITE: Khan MWU, Naeem S, Iqbal Q. Prosthetic rehabilitation of an acquired maxillary defect with definitive obturator prosthesis- A clinical technique. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):100-102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.100
Received: 09 August 2019, Accepted: 15 February 2020

Download PDF

Nibrin Double Strand Breakage and its Role in Development of Cancers

Fizza Abidi                                               BDS

Mervyn Hossein                                     FDSRCS(Ed), FDSRCS, FFDRCSI

Saima Akram                                          BSc, BDS, MDS

Angabeen Anjum                                   BDS

The human genetic information has been orchestrated by DNA-damage response pathways. DNA damage response, DNA repair,programmed apoptosis and cell cycle progession are responsible for maintaining the genomic integrity, they initiates the process of tumorigenesis if they are not regulated properly.An article research was done through Google Scholar, Pubmed and
was used for an electronic search of articles, using the following keywords: Double stranded breakage, Nibrin, P95, NBS1.The aim of the review is to point out the impact of double strand breakage and the role of Nibrin in development of cancers. The double strand breakage are pathological insults for all the microorganisms because they can cause the elimination of the essential genetic information, which results in the destruction of DNA replication Nibrin is the first DNA repair gene whose overexpression can promotes the process of tumorigenesis by the activation of phosphoinositol 3 kinase /akt pathways.
KEYWORDS: Nibrin, Double strand breakage, P95, NBS1.
HOW TO CITE: Abidi F, Hossein M, Akram S, Anjum A. Nibrin double strand breakage and its role in development of cancers. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):94-99.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.94
Received: 18 April 2019, Accepted: 17 February 2020

Download PDF

Citation Indices: A Review

Nazeer Khan                                                    PhD

To measure the contribution of a scientist is not only an academic exercise. It helps greatly to the promotion committees, funding agencies, and national & international awarding commissions. Many citations indices have been developed to determine the contribution and impact of scientists’ researches. This review article covers 27 citation indices, and computed 23 indices which are not very difficult to compute. Values of these indices are calculated using the author’s citations. To determine the quality of research performance it is suggested to use several indices and indicators, instead of only one. However, there is dire need to develop a better index which should be easy to calculate and reduce the drawbacks of h related indices.
KEYWORDS: Citation indices, h-index, g-index, e-index, s-index, x-index.
HOW TO CITE: Khan N. Citation indices: A review. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):87-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.87
Received: 30 December 2019, Accepted: 29 February 2020

INTRODUCTION

The scientists who are well known and have received many academic awards, such as Noble award, Academic of Science award recipients, do not require to assess their impact on scientific literature. However, other scientists and authors do demand to evaluate their contributions and impact on the scientific ecosystem, for their recruitment as faculty members, promotion, award of research grants, academic awards etc. Quantification of the scientific contributions is required for such awards and promotions. However, the process of quantification is quite
opaque, clubby and capricious.
Many information, such as number of publications in impact factor journals (Institute for Scientific Information
(ISI)), publication in journals without any impact factor, number of recent publications, number of publications in national and international journals, total number of citations etc. are being used for above mentioned awards and
promotion. Many criteria have developed for assessing the researchers’ contributions, such as: 1) Total number of
publications (Np), 2) Total number of citations (Nc,tot), 3) Citations per publications, ratio of Nc,tot to Np, 4) Total number of significant publications, number of publications with an arbitrary fixed number (y) of citations, and 5) Number of citations of few most cited publications. However, there are many disadvantages of using these criteria for assessing the contribution of scientists. Criterion number 1 concentrates only on research productivity and does not give the impact of the publications in the literature. Criterion 2 may overestimate the contribution of some highly cited papers, such as review articles. It could also be increased by some comprehensive national study, in which the particular person was just a co-author. Criterion 3 may downgrade the scientists with larger latest productivity than fewer older productivity.
Criterion 4 and 5 depend upon the arbitrary numbers. This review article briefly discusses the methods and techniques that have been introduced after 2005, to measure the research productivity and its impact on the scientific literature, except the ones which are very complicated in computations. The author has used his own publications and citations as an example to show the values of 23 citation methods except four which are very complicated in computations.
Indices
N-index: N-index defines as the total number of publications of a researcher. All the co-authors take the equal
rank. It does not count the citations, means it ignores the impact of the publications. Since it is easy to calculate, therefore it is still being used for academic promotions in Pakistan and other countries.
h-index: To overcome the problems mentioned in the introduction, Jorge E. Hirsch, a physicist from University of California, USA has developed a reasonably better criterion of a scientist’s productivity and citations, known as h-index1,
which is defined as:
A scientist has index h if h of his/her Np articles have at least h citations each and the other (Np-h) articles have
less than h citations each. It is robust (unaffected by many uncited articles, as well as some highly cited articles) and it mingled by publications and citations. Hence, this index supports those scientists who publish a continuous stream of articles with persisting and above average impact.2
A further advantage of h index that any Web of Science can be used to determine this index, because this index does not change by adding low cited articles.2
The minimum number of citations of a scientist with h-index is h2. Of course the total number of citations (Nc,tot)
of the scientist is usually a lot more than h2. If we relate Nc,tot

and h2 by the equation: Nc,tot = ah2, the value of ‘a’ will be somewhere 3 to 5.1
Therefore this index loses a lot of information. In the example mentioned at the end of the article showed that h index only covers 23% of the total citations.
Burrell3 showed that the h-index is approximately linear in career length, log of productivity (publication) rate and log mean citation rate for moderate citation rates, using Poisson distribution, in the stochastic modeling. It means than h-index can be estimated with straight line using the above mentioned predictors. Braun et al4 defined the h-type index for the journals; calculated the h-index of few journals and compared them with the ISI impact factors. Braun et al5 also recommended of using the h index as an alternative to the Impact Factor (IF), because it is robust and combines the effect of quantity and quality (number of publications and citations). Bornmann & Danial2
indicated that the convergent validity of the h index in different research fields indicate that the h index is a valid indicator for research performance at the micro level.
Hirsch indicated that a scientist might be described as “successful” when achieving an h-index of 20 after 20 years,
or “outstanding” when scoring h of 40 over the same period, and an h index of 60 after 20 years, or 90 after 30 years
characterize truly unique individuals.1
Many weaknesses of h index have been identified by different authors. Few of them are as follows: (1) h index could be affected of scientists with the same name if it has been calculated using web of science or other search engine. (2) This index does not distinguish between active and inactive researchers.
Significant works of past of an inactive scientist could give higher h-index as compared to the latest work of a present
active scientist.3 A senior and well-established scientist always has advantage as compared to newcomer.4 Comparisons of researchers of different fields on the basis of h-index are not appropriate.5
This index could be influenced by self-citations and number of co-authors.2 Many indices developed later on and tried to resolve these issues. hm- index: One of the main shortcomings of the hindex is that it does not consider all the citations and publications. In developing the distribution theory regarding h-index, Glanzel6 introduced hm-index, which was little modification of average citation rate discussed earlier and defined as:

h(2)-index: Kosmulski7 , indicated that h-index of a scientist could be mixed up with the other scientists of the
same last name and initials, until and unless the search researcher knows the specialty and interest or complete curriculum vitae of the particular scientist. To overcome this problem, he introduced the following index h(2) index7, as
citation index: h(2) index is defined as the highest natural number such that h(2) most-cited papers received at least [h(2)]2 citations each. h(2) in the example is 11. It means that there are 11 articles which have more than (11)2=121 citations.
Since h(2) is quite smaller than h-index, therefore there would be lot less chance of mixing-up of the authorship as mentioned in the above paragraph. The lower bound of the total number of citations (Nc,tot ) would be [h(2)].3
Therefore the relationship between h(2) and h indices will be: h(2) = h2/3. Kosmulski computed the h index and h(2) index of 19 Chemistry professors of a Polish university, and determined the correlations between those indices. The correlation between h and h(2) indices was quite high with value of 0.9138.
h(I)- index: One of the shortcomings of h-index is that it does not consider how many co-authors have been involved in publishing the articles. Batista et al8 introduced h(I)-index which overcomes this problem and is defined as:

Na(T) is the total number of authors (author multiple occurrences are allowed) in h core. In the given example the first article has 13 authors, second article has 11 authors, third article has 6 authors and the last article of h-core, i.e, 33rd article has 5 authors. Altogether, those 33 articles has 195 authors. Using the above formula h(I) is 5.58.
g-index: Egghe9 pointed out that it makes sense that publications with low citations should have insensitive impact
in the citation index as embraced in h-index. However, this index is also insensitive regarding high citations with the papers which have already been included in the h-core. He indicated that those high citations should somehow be counted in the index. Egghe introduced g-index, as stated below, to overcome this weakness of the h-index. According to the definition, if the articles are arranged in decreasing order of the citations, then g-index is the highest number g of articles that together received g2 or more citations. g-index is unique and always greater or equal to h-index (g > h). It can easily be seen that higher the citations in the top-ranked papers, the higher the g-index.

Ravichandra Rao10 compared the correlations between h-index and g-index of 168 authors and found a very high
correlation of 0.97.
m index: The m-index, proposed by Bornmann et al11, is the median number of citations received by articles in the h-core. m-index is smaller or equal than h index.
A-index: Jin12, a bibliometrician from China tried to solve the problem of not counting upon articles having a larger number of citation indicated by Egghe that high citations should be counted somehow. He tried to solve the problem by taking the mean of the citations of h papers of h-core. Therefore, the A-index is:

Where ci is the citations of ith paper of h- papers arrangedknnnnnn,  in descending order of citations. A-index is equal to h-index if all the cis are equal to h. Jim el al12 showed that A > g > h.
R-index: Jin et al13 defined one more index that depends upon square root instead of sum of citations of h-core. This one is labeled as R-index and defined as:

if all he cis are equal to h.
AR-index: One of the problems of h-index is the lack of sensitivity regarding the performance changes. It never decreases, even the scientist slowdown in publication or stop producing publications. To overcome this problem Jin14 introduced AR-index, which is age dependent. AR-index is defined as:

Where ci is defined earlier and ai is the age of the ith publication. If all cis are equal to h and ai is one year for all i then AR = h. AR decreases as time passes and it shows that the scientist is slowing down or not producing.
m quotient: Burrell3 has discussed different scenarios, such as publication/production rates, citations rates and scientists’ career length. He picked up different statistical distributions and matched them with some possible citations options. In this his paper he defined a citation index known as ‘m quotients’, which is the average h index per year and computed as follows:

where y is the number of years since first publication. The m quotient avoids a bias towards more senior scientists with longer careers and more publications in past, but now slowdown or stop publishing in recent past.
e-index: h-index only consider the information that can be taken from h2 (square of h) citations, and ignores thea remaining citations. To overcome this problem, Chun-Ting

Zhang15, a physicist from China introduced a new index, known as e-index which is complementary to h-index, part of ignored citations and defined as follows:

where e2 are the remaining citations (citations outside of h-core) and ci are the citations received by the ith paper. e2+h2 cover the total citations of the scientist up to the h publications.
hg-index: The h- and the g-index measure different features of a scientist’s citations. h-index closes itself into h2
citation, which is lot less than total citations and insensitive of highly cited articles. However, g-index which is more
sensitive towards highly cited articles. Together, g and h present could present a concise picture of a scientist’s achievements in terms of publications and citations.
Alonso et al16 introduced hg-index by taking the geometric mean of h and g indices and is defined as:

hw-index: This index was introduced by Egghe and Rousseau17 in 2007. This weighted h-index is defined as:

where ro is the largest row index j such that

hT-index: As mentioned earlier, publications with low citations are insensitive in the citation index as embraced
in h-index. However, this index is also insensitive regarding high citations with the papers which have already been included in the index. To include all the citations of the publications, average citations per article was introduced, to make a better index for the citations of the all the publications, Anderson et al.18 introduced hT-index, which
is defined as:

Where, hT (j) is defined as:12q

Where, N is the total number of publications, cj is the number of citations of jth publication, arrange in descendingorder. The main advantage of hT over h index is that it includes all the citations of the articles and involves the duration of publication.
Since the computation to determine h.. needs complex mathematics therefore this index has not been used in the
example.
i×cindex (maxprod index): To cover-up all the publications and citations, Kusmolaski19 introduced an index known as maxprod index. It is defined as: “the highest value among values i×ci, where i denotes the ith article and ci is the number of citations received by the ith article”. maxprod = max (i×ci ).
w-index: In calculation of h-index of an individual researcher, the author considers equal weight in the publications, irrespective of the order in the authorship list. To overcome this problem Zhang20 has introduced a weighed h-index known as w-index in 2009 which depends upon the rank of the corresponding author in the publication. The weight of the first author and the corresponding author are assigned as 1 and the remaining authors are given the rank of

where n is the total number of authors in the article and k is the order of the corresponding author. Except the first
author and the corresponding author, the w-index reduces the h-index of other authors. He also introduces the coefficient of author’s• contribution by dividing the weighted citation with total citations.
f-index: As mentioned earlier, g-index could be more than the number of cited publications. To resolve this problem of g-index Tol21 has introduced f-index using harmonic mean, which is defined as:

f-index is always lesser than the cited publications. Tol21 also introduced another index, based on geometric
mean namely; t-index.

t-index: t-index is defined as:

( is the symbol of multiplication, like is the symbol of summation)
In both f and t indices, the additional citation of a low cited paper counts more than an additional citation of a high
cited paper. However, this effect is stronger in case of the harmonic mean. The following inequality exists between h,
g, f and t as: h < f < t < g.
W-index (Qiang Wu): Qiang Wu22 introduced a citation index in 2008 which is simple and easy to calculate.
W-index is defined as the maximum number of articles a scientist has in which each receives the citation of 10w or
more and the remaining has fewer than 10(w+1) citations. Qiang indicated that in most of the cases, w-index is about one-fourth of h-index. Furthermore, if a scientist has w-index of 10 or more, he/she should be considered as outstanding researcher. Qiang showed that this index has very high correlation with A-index, followed by g-index and then h-index.
j-index: Todeschini23, an Hungarian scholar introduced a new bibliographic citation index known as j-index and
defined as:

j-index follows the same course of ideas like h-index with increments, but overcome the weaknesses of h-index
of degeneracy and insensitivity to citation distribution. Therefore, j-index is the improved version of h-index.
s-index: Silagadze24 introduced a new bibliographic index in 2009, known as the strength or s-index, using a citation entropy and is defined as:

Silagadze showed that s-index gives better results than h-index in some special cases. However, the articles which
do not get citation any more, get poor results than h-index.
i10 index: In 2011 Google has introduced a simple index known as i10 index.25 It defines as, the number of publications with at least 10 citations. It is a simple and straightforward indexing measure and easy to calculate. Google has picked up an arbitrary number 10 for showing some reasonable impact of the articles.
h• -index: Zhang26 has introduced a more comprehensive index in 2016 including all: h-squared, excess and h-tail citations. It is defined as: h = rh,

C-index: Stallings et al27 has introduced this index. The main purpose of this index was to count the contribution
effect in the article. Since the computation process needs heavy mathematical skills and understanding, therefore has not been discussed over here.
x-index: Wan28 has introduced a new bibliographic index which indicates the scientist’s impact emerged from influential articles . It is defined as the largest number of papers with influential citation number > x, where each influential citation comes from a paper for which the average ACNPP (Average Citation Number per Paper) of its authors > x. The ACNPP is the ratio of the total citations to the total number of publications of the author.
X-index is always less or equal to h-index. It emphasizes more on the citation quality than number of citations.
The calculation of x-index needs lengthy computation, therefore this index has not been included in the example.
Graphic index: Neill et al29, developed a graphic method to show the researcher’s productivity. It plots the graph of average citation with impact of the journal and time period of the publication. This method also allows the comparison of total articles as well as impact with his/her peers, published in prominent scientific journals. This method could also extrapolate the trend of early-career scientists with future expected outcomes.

DISCUSSION

To measure the contribution of a scientist for award, nomination or promotion several criterion have been
suggested in the literature. Initially decision makers were using the number of publications as the criterion for promotion and nomination. Later on the factor of effective publications were added for evaluation and hence, number of citations were also included as one of the feature for assessment.
Usually the citations of a scientist are extremely skewed. In the example of this paper, one publication has received 663 citations and first ten publications, about 8% of the total publications, have accounted more than 50% of the total citations. On the other hand, 13 publications showed zero citations. But before the introduction of Hirsch h index, the

criterion for promotion or awards was either the number of publications or citations. Hirsch developed h index which involved both the number of publications and citations. This index eagerly welcomed by the scientists working in information sciences and bibliometric. Within four years of publishing of Hirsch’s work, about 150 papers published related to this article.16 However, scientists have also showed many weaknesses of this index and presented ideas to rectify those problems. Twenty six different variants of h-index are discussed in this article.
The major drawbacks of h-index, such as (1) not considering all the citations (2) insensitiveness of articles with very high citations, (3) same weight given to each authors (4) It never decreases even researcher slowdown and stop publishing etc. To rectify these problems, investigators presented different ideas. Ghanzel (hT-index), Anderson et al (hT-index), Kusmolaski (i x c-index), Qiang (W-index) and Silagadze(s-index) addressed the problem of not considering all the citations. Egghe9 (g-index), Jin12 (A-index), Jin et al13 (R-index), Alonso et al16 (hg-index) and
Tol21 (f-index and t-index) discussed the problem of h-index regarding insensitivity of articles with very high citations. Batista et al8 (h(I)-index) and Zhang20 (w-index) focused on the problem of equal weight given to each author for h-index calculation. Jin et al13 (AR-index) and Burrell3 (m-quotients) tried to rectified the problem of ‘never decreasing phenomena’. However, Rao et al and Jin et al indicated high correlations between h, g and r indices. Bornmann et al30, published a meta-analysis of h-index with 37 other variants of h-index and they also found high correlations between hindex and other variant. Therefore, these advancements have hardly increased any added information to the h-index. In a recent review on indices related with h-index, Waltman31 has discussed the indices along with normalization for field differences and adjustment for co-authors. However, it is quite clear that, h-index underestimates a lot of the impact of a scientist. Therefore, there is dire need to develop a better
index which should be easy to calculate and reduce the drawbacks of h-index. Statisticians could be involved to develop such indices, which should have strong distribution baseline and have desirable statistical properties. To determine the quality of research performance it is suggested to use several indices and indicators, instead of only one, such as number of articles with zero citation, highly cited articles, articles with first authorship and h index. It should also be noted that publication and number of citations differs significantly across the disciplines. The scientists of field of management science, literature, information technology, humanity etc. do not publish as frequent as the scientists, related Physics, Chemistry, Health sciences etc. Consequently, the number of citations in the former fields are lot less than the later ones. To overcome this problem ‘relative, internationally field-normalized impact’ of publications, discussed by van Rann et al32, could be used as one of the additional indicator. Furthermore, as indicated earlier the hindex does not depend upon the time period of the publication. Therefore, if h-index to be used to quantify the scientists’ research output and impact, then it should be comparable within the same discipline and same publication period.

REFERENCES

  1. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl AcadSci USA, 2005; 102:16569-572 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 1a Anonymous (2005). Data Point. Science, 309(5738), 1181 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.309.5738.1181c
  2. Bornmann, L, Daniel, HD. What do we know about the h index? J Am Soc Inform Sc Tech, 2007;58,1381-385
    https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
  3. Burrell QL. Hirsch’s h-index: A stochastic model. J Informetrics 2007; 1:16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2006.07.001
  4. Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A Hirsch-type index for journals.Scientometrics 2006; 69:169-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4
  5. Braun T, Glänzel W, Schubert A. A Hirschtypeindex for journals. The Scientist 2005:19: 8
  6. Glanzel Glanzel, W. (2008) On some new bibliometric applications of statistics related to the h-index. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/bitstream/123456789/198470/1/MSI_0801.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1989-0
  7. Kosmulski M. A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. Inter Soc Scientometric Informetrics newsletter 2006; 2:4-6.
  8. Batista PD, Campiteli MG, Kinouchi O. Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? Scientometrics 2006: 68:179189 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0090-4
  9. Egghe L. An improvement of the h-index: The g-index. ISSI newsletter. 2006;2:8-9.
  10. Ravichandra Rao, I.K. (2007). Distributions of Hirsch-index and G-index: An empirical study. In D. Torres-Salinas & H.F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. 2, pp. 655-658). Madrid, Spain:Spanish Rese Counl (CSIC).
  11. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Daniel HD. Are There Better Indices for Evaluation Purposes than the h Index? A Comparison of Nine Different Variants of the h Index Using Data from Biomedicine. J Am Soc Inform Sc Tec 2008; 59:830-37 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20806
  12. Jin B H. H-index: An evaluation indicator proposed by scientist. Science Focus (in Chinese), 2006,1:8-9,
  13. Jin BH, Liang L, Rousseau R, Egghe L. The R-and AR-indices: Complementing the h- index. Chinese science bulletin. 2007;52:855-63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9
  14. Jin BH. The AR-index: Complementing the h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2007;3:6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9
  15. Zhang CT. The e-Index, Complementing the h-Index for Excess Citations. PLoS ONE9 2007 4:e5429.
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005429
  16. Alonsos, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. hg-index: a new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics 2010;82:391-400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5
  17. Egghe L, Rousseau R. An h-index weighted by citation impact. Information Processing Management 2008:44;770-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.05.003
  18. Anderson, TR, Hankin, RKS., & Killworth, P. D. Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output. Scientometrics, 2008;76:57-588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2071-2
  19. Kosmulski, M. MAXPROD – A New Index for Assessment of the Scientific Outputof an Individual, and a Comparison with the h-index. Inter J Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics, 2007;1: 1-5.
  20. Zhang CT. A proposal for calculating weighted citations based on author rank. EMBO reports. 2009;10:416-17. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2009.74
  21. Tol, RSJ. The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists. Scientometrics, 2009;80,317-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-2079-7
  22. Wu Q. The w-index: A significant improvement of the h-index. arXiv preprint arXiv:0805.4650. 2008.
  23. Todeschini R. The j-index: a new bibliometric index and multivariate comparisons between other common indices. Scientometrics 2011: 87:621-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0346-5
  24. Silagadze ZK. Citation entropy and research impact estimation. Acta Phys. Polon. B 2010; 41: 2325-2333.
  25. Google Scholar Blog (2011). Google Scholar citations open to all. Published 16 November 2011. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from http://googlescholar.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-scholar- citationsopen-to-all.html
  26. Zhang CT. The h’-index, effectively improving the h-index based on the citation distribution. PloS one. 2013;8:e59912 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059912
  27. Stallings J, Vance E, Yang J, Vannier MW, Liang J, Pang L, Dai L, Ye I, and Wang G. Determining scientific impact using a collaboration index. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110:9680-85. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1220184110
  28. Wan X. x-index: A Fantastic New Indicator for Quantifying a Scientist’s Scientific Impact. arXiv preprint arXiv 2014:1405.0641.
  29. Neill US, Thompson CB, Gibson DS. Assessing research productivity: A new way of evaluating academics’ research output using easily obtained data. The Scientist 2015; 29(1).
  30. Bornmann L, Mutz R, Hug SE, Daniel HD. A multilevel metaanalysis of studies reporting correlations between the h index and 37 different h index variants. J Informetrics. 2011;5:346-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.006
  31. Waltman L. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. J Informetric. 2016;10:365-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
  32. Van Raan AFJ. Comparison of the Hirsch index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups. Scientometrics 2006: 67:491-502 https://doi.org/10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.10

  1. Professor of Biostatistics, Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi.
    Corresponding author: “Dr. Nazeer Khan” < nazeerkhan54@gmail.com >

Citation Indices: A Review

Nazeer Khan                                                    PhD

To measure the contribution of a scientist is not only an academic exercise. It helps greatly to the promotion committees, funding agencies, and national & international awarding commissions. Many citations indices have been developed to determine the contribution and impact of scientists’ researches. This review article covers 27 citation indices, and computed 23 indices which are not very difficult to compute. Values of these indices are calculated using the author’s citations. To determine the quality of research performance it is suggested to use several indices and indicators, instead of only one. However, there is dire need to develop a better index which should be easy to calculate and reduce the drawbacks of h related indices.
KEYWORDS: Citation indices, h-index, g-index, e-index, s-index, x-index.
HOW TO CITE: Khan N. Citation indices: A review. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):87-93.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.87
Received: 30 December 2019, Accepted: 29 February 2020

Download PDF

Knowledge of Pakistani Dentist Towards Light Curing Units- A Cross Sectional Analysis

Beenish Fatima Alam                                    BDS, MSc, MFDS RCS(Ed)

Talha Nayab                                                   BDS, MSc

Arqam Najmi                                                  BDS, MSc

Umaima Khan                                                BDS

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge of dentists working in a teaching hospital of Karachi regarding light cure units.
METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional study was conducted over a time frame of 6 months. A questionnaire was distributed to dentists working in a dental teaching hospital. Survey employed in this study has been adopted and revised from the study lead by Tüloglu et al. Questionnaire focused on the demographic details along with queries related to usage of light cure devices, type of light cure unit used, curing time used for composites and adhesive, light intensity used for sufficient polymerization. Statistical analysis of the study was done using Chi square and Fishers Exact and descriptive analysis done by analyzing frequency and percentage.
RESULT: Over-all 156 dentists participated in this study, which includes 34% (n= 53) males and 66% (n= 103) females participated. Light-emitting diode (LED) was commonly preferred by 66% of the respondents aged 21-29 years, followed by Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH). 34% of the dentists of age group 30-39 years had knowledge concerning options for irradiation accessible by Light Curing Units (LCU). Conventional mode was most preferred by 60% of 21-29 aged respondents. Majority of dentists advocated using 10-20 sec for curing adhesive and composite restorations. 66% of respondents aged commented using 100-300 mv/cm2 intensity of light , while 30-39 years aged used 300-500 mv/cm2 for curing 2 mm thick composite.
CONCLUSION: It is apparent that dental practitioners of age group of 21-29 years have less knowledge regarding dental light-curing units, concerning the technical knowledge and correct usage of light curing device.
KEYWORDS: Light-emitting diode, light intensity, Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH), dentists, composites.
HOW TO CITE: Alam BF, Nayab T, Najmi A, Khan U. Knowledge of Pakistani dentist towards light curing units- a cross sectional analysis. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):81-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.81
Received: 11September 2019, Accepted: 10 February 2020

INTRODUCTION

Dental Composites are the most commonly used restorative materials in dentistry for more than three decades.1
Usage of visible blue light to cure dental composite has increased tremendously. Visible light is used for curing not only composite fillings but also to cure various luting cements, glass ionomer cement, bonding agents and some of the temporary filling materials.2,3
The strength of composite restorations depends upon resin-based composite subjected to visible light source having
appropriate wavelength range (blue or blue and violet) and contains radiant exposure ranging from 8-16 J/cm2.4,5
Additionally incomplete polymerization can lead to discoloration of restoration, reduces hardness and affects the mechanical strength of composite; likewise it also causes high solubility and water sorption within the composite.6 Furthermore there’s also likelihood of sensitivity, pulpal involvement and failure of treatment to occur.7
Different factors have been identified, playing crucial role during polymerization reaction of composite. These comprises of intensity and wavelength of LCU, site of dental cavity in mouth, duration of irradiation being subjected, path and distance of tip of device, type and formulation of composite used and the width of restoration.8 Four different types of light curing units are available for providing adequate polymerization of composites; these include Quartz-Tungsten `Halogen, Plasma Arc Curing, Light-Emitting diode and Argon Laser.9
Conventional QTH, having wide spectrum are capable of curing camphorquinone and short wavelength photo initiators. It emits blue light having wavelengths of 380-510 nm, and sufficiently cures 2 mm deep composite restorations within 40 seconds10. However the excessive heat generation has detrimental effect on bulbs of LCU and
lifespan of the device.11-13
Argon LCU generates a wavelength of 488nm adequate for generating polymerization reaction within the composite14. Added benefits include less time needed for curing, adequately curing deep fillings. Additionally it reduces risk of secondary caries by altering surface anatomy of enamel and dentine.15,16,17 Conversely the device is quite bulky, expensive and difficult to use, in case of large fillings due to smaller fiber size.18
Plasma LCU can efficiently polymerize composite in less time by generating power density of 100 mw/cm2 . 19 On the other hand its ability to cure thick composite filling is questionable, light source has a 10 second waiting time after each use.20
In 1995 Miller et al proposed using LED to overcome the drawbacks linked with halogen based polymerization.
LED has added advantage of less heat production, greater longevity and less heat dissipation. It generates blue light
having wavelength of 450-500nm.21 Moreover they are cordless and battery operated which provides further benefit.22
Internationally many researches have been conducted regarding the knowledge of dentists towards the light cure
units but similar documentation in our country is insufficient. Previously conducted researches in Pakistan have focused on assessing the quality of light intensity output using the Quartz-tungsten-halogen (QTH) curing units. The current study was commenced to assess the knowledge of Pakistani dentists towards curing light by investigating the adequate usage, types of LCU, duration of usage and maintenance of light units in routine clinical practice. The main objective was to examine the present knowledge of dental practitioners in Bahria University Medical and Dental College and to assess the areas that need to be improved that can be helpful in improving the quality of restorative procedures performed.

METHODOLOGY

This cross- sectional study has been conducted among the dentists working in the dental OPD of Bahria University
Medical and Dental College over a period of six months. 170 survey forms were circulated to different dentists, out
of which, 156 filled forms while 14 unanswered questionnaires were provided. The dentists were briefly explained regarding the details of questionnaire before asking them to fill the questionnaires. Verbal consent was taken by
all the participants before initiating the study. All the participants were ensured concerning maintaining anonymity of the responses received.
Ethical authorization for the study was formally obtained from the Ethical Review Committee of Bahria University
Medical and Dental College (ERC 15/2019) before initiating the study. This research has been directed in accordance
with the Declaration of Helsinki. It requires six to seven minutes to totally fill the questionnaires.
Survey employed for this study has been adopted from the study lead by Tüloglu et al23, as this survey was simple
to use and easy to accommodate in our clinical dental setting. House-officers, lecturers and all specialist who were either working in dental OPD of Bahria University or doing private evening clinics giving consent to participate in the study have been incorporated, while dentists who did not give consent and all the undergraduate students were excluded from the study. The mean age of recently graduated dental house officers was 21-24 years, lectures had age range of 25-30 years and specialist/trainees had 30-39 years.
The initial part of survey entailed the details of the dentist such as age, gender, years after graduation and the type of
employment. The subsequent segment focused on the queries associated with usage of light curing, type of light cure unit, curing time used for composites and adhesive, light intensity used for sufficient polymerization, and maintenance for light curing.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

OpenEpiTM (v-3) has been used for calculation of sample size to be used for the study. Statistical conditions used were 95% confidence interval with 5% margin of error.
The required sample size was found to be 170. All the variables were coded and entered in SPSS (v21. Descriptive
statistics comprising of frequency and percentages were used to evaluate the responses. Test of significance has been done using Chi square and Fisher’s exact test was used to identify differences in responses, P<0.05 was considered to be significant.

RESULTS

Over-all 156 dentists participated in this study, amongst which 34% were (n= 53) males and 66% were (n= 103)
females.
Concerning years of professional experience in dentistry, 55% of dentist had experience of 0-2 years; approximately
24% has experience of 2-5 years while 8% had experience of 5-10 years and last 13.5% of the respondents had experience of 10 years. Moreover Only 31% of the

Table 1: Describes Demographic details of the respondents

Table 2: Association of age group with Knowledge regarding LCU

participants had post graduate degrees. Regarding the knowledge of LCU, 66% of the participant having age range of 21-29 advocated using LED followed by QTH, while 55% of the respondents aged 30-39 years identified QTH as mostly used followed by LED. 60% of the respondents having age of 21-29 identified using conventional mode for curing. 30 seconds were most commonly used for curing composite and adhesive restorations by both 21-29 years, while all the respondents aged 30-39 years used 15 seconds for curing. Regarding light cure units offering irradiation, 39% of the respondents aged 21-29 years had no knowledge regarding irradiation,

Table 3: Association of Gender with Knowledge regarding LCU

as compared to 34% of the 30-39 years who had information. When enquired about curing light intensity for polymerization 66% of 21-29 years old identified using 100-300 mv/cm2 while 55% of 31-39 years advocated using 300-500 mv/cm2.
Statistically significant association was noted among gender with information regarding Light curing units. LED was identified by 73% of females while QTH was recognized by 62% of males. Conventional mode for curing was preferred by 52% of females whereas 64% of males were unsure.15 seconds was used to cure composite and adhesive restoration by majority of females and males. In response to light cure intensity used for polymerization 85% of females recognized 100-300 mv/cm2 while 87% males commended using 300- 500 mv/cm2 (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

Satisfactory polymerization reaction of composite plays a fundamental role in providing optimum physical and mechanical properties. Insufficient polymerization can affect the color constancy, strength, toughness, water sorption of the dental composites. This study basically focuses on assessing knowledge of Pakistani dentists towards light cure units and what areas needs to be improved.
Sound evidence of connotation amid professional experience of dentistry and years of practice in the field of dentistry was noted to be statistically significant. These results contrast from the study conducted by Santini and
Turner, who found no significant association.24
The findings of the current study specified that LED (72.8%) followed by QTH (12.6 %) were commonly preferred
devices by 21-29 years of respondents and females. These results are in accordance with study conducted in India, where three-fourth of dentists preferred LED, while QTH was preferred by one fourth of the dentists. It can be attributed to the fact that life span of LED is quite more than QTH, additionally LED units do not generate heat upon polymerization or on structure of tooth and lastly they are portable that causes ease in use.25
Sufficient understanding regarding the irradiance is vital; that not only ensures accurate curing of restoration but also prevents chances of damage to the oral tissues. In the current study majority of respondents did not have sufficient awareness regarding light cure units offering option for irradiation, these outcomes are in agreement with the study directed by Tüloglu et al, where the respondents had sufficient knowledge. It can be due to lack of understanding of the younger respondents about LCU during undergraduate years and additionally they had no post graduate qualification, which can in long term effect the quality of restorations.23
With the recent advancements made in the field of dentistry, different modes for curing have been introduced in order to lessen the polymerization shrinkage. These include fast cure, soft cure, pulse-delay mode and conventional
mode. According to the female participants aged 21-29 years most common mode utilized for curing was conventional mode, these outcomes are in accord with study ordain by Aguiar et al, who stated that improvement in hardness of composites was observed while using conventional mode.26
However these results contrast from the study lead by Yazici et al who identified soft cure to be more efficient as compared to conventional mode in reducing chances of shrinkage and improves the marginal fit of material.27 Morover participants aged 30-39 years had no information hence it can be due to lack of interest and having insufficient knowledge.
Manufacturers of composite and LCU provide general recommendations for sufficient amount of time required for
curing the material; however these vary according to thickness of material and require an ideal environment to perform the procedure.28 Manufacturers generally recommend curing time of 20-40 seconds, while the dark shades of composites must be subjected to irradiation for longer time to be sufficiently cured.25 The findings of the current study state that majority of participants belonging to different age group and genders preferred curing composites and adhesives for 10-20 seconds. A positive relation was noted in survey conducted by Barghi et al, who noted that most of the dentists cured a 2 mm thick composite resin for 20 seconds.29 Sixty-six percent of the respondents aged 21-29 years answered that curing light intensity at 100-300 mv/cm2 is appropriate for curing a 2 mm thick composite restoration, while respondents aged 30-39 years identified using 300-500 mv/cm2. These results contrasts with the study performed by Jadhav et al and Rueggeberg et al, who stated that light intensity of 400 mW/cm2 is adequately sufficient, to cure a 2mm thick increment 30,31. Researches conducted in past have revealed that LCU having intensities less than 400mW/cm2 can lead to insufficient polymerization of the inner most increments of restorations affecting its mechanical properties provoking collapse, wear, enhances formation of secondary caries and increases water sorption.32,33 This study is one of the first studies to be conducted in Karachi in assessing the knowledge of dentist towards light cure units.
It assess their knowledge regarding the different types of light cure units, adequate curing time and the different modes available for curing composites. Few limitations that have been identified include small sample size. Additionally it was a single center study, hence incorporating more dental universities and adding respondents
having post graduate qualification would tremendously improve the outcomes of the study and will be beneficial in identifying areas that needs improvement.

CONCLUSION

From the present study, it is apparent that awareness of dental practitioners especially aged 21-29 years regarding
light-curing units is deficient with respect to the technical knowledge and usage of light curing device for adequate
curing. Adequate polymerization of composite plays crucial role in achieving sufficient strength and hardness within
composite. Hence knowledge regarding the different types of light cure units and the modes for curing and the intensity required for adequate curing should be incorporated in the undergraduate curriculum. Workshops and seminars should be also be organised to provide further information to both undergraduates and graduates.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The current study highlights the needs for carrying out multi-centric research in order to identify level of understanding and knowledge of dentist regarding the optimum curing time and irradiation to be utilized. Moreover
newly graduated dental student needs to have familiarity regarding the technical cognizance and mode of application
of different instruments and equipment’s used within the clinical departments of Dental OPD such as ultrasonic scalers, amalgamators. Additionally further proficiency can be provided by means of lectures or workshops.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared

REFERENCES

  1. Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C. Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:992-96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0204
  2. Burgess JO, Walker RS, Porche CJ, Rappold AJ. Light curing – An update. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:889-906.
  3. Martin FE. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998; 26:239-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00004-3
  4. Pearson GJ, Longman CM. Water sorption and solubility of resinbased materials following inadequate polymerization by a visible-light curing system. J Oral Rehab 1989;16:57-61 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01317.x
  5. Roulet J-F, Rocha MG, Shen C, Khudhair MM, de Oliveira DCRS. Beam profile characterization of a dental light curing unit using a spectrometer-based method. Stoma Edu J. 2018;5:84-91. https://doi.org/10.25241/stomaeduj.2018.5(2).art.1
  6. El-Mowafy O, El-Badrawy W, Lewis DW, Shokati B, Kermalli J, Soliman O, et al. Intensity of quartz-tungsten-halogen light-curing units used in private practice in Toronto. JAm Dent Association. 2005; 136:766-73; quiz 806-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0260
  7. Heft MW, Gilbert GH, Dolan TA, Foerster U. Restoration fractures, cusp fractures and root fragments in a diverse sample of adults: 24- month incidence. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:1459-64. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0057
  8. Fan PL, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002; 133:429-34; quiz 91-3.
    https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0200
  9. Namrata M, Ganapathy D. Light cure devices. Int J Orofac Res 2017; 2:37-9.
  10. Ontiveros C.J.C., Paravina Rade D. Light-emitting diode polymerization: A review of performance, Part I. Acta Stomatol Naissi 2006;22:601-10
  11. Martin FE. A survey of the efficiency of visible light curing units. J Dent 1998; 26:239-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00004-3
  12. Miyazaki M, Hattori T, Ichiishi Y, Kondo M, Onose H, Moore BK, et al. Evaluation of curing units used in private dental offices. Oper Dent 1998; 23:50-4.
  13. Leonard DL, Charlton DG, Hilton TJ. Effect of curing-tip diameter on the accuracy of dental radiometers. Oper Dent 1999;24:31-7.
  14. Blankenau R, Kelsey WP, Kutsch VK. Clinical applications of argon laser in restorative dentistry. In: Miserendino LJ, Pick RM, editors. Lasers in Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1995:
    217-30
  15. Harris DM, Pick RM. Laser physics. In: Miserendino LJ, Pick RM, editors. Lasers in Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company Inc.;1995:27-38.
  16. Walsh LJ. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J 2003;48:146-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00025.x
  17. Anic I, Pavelic B, Peric B, Matsumoto K. In vitro pulp chamber temperature rises associated with the argon laser polymerization of composite resin. Lasers Surg Med 1996;19:438-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9101(1996)19:4<438::AIDLSM9>3.0.CO;2-T
  18. Walsh LJ. The current status of laser applications in dentistry. Aust Dent J. 2003;48:146-55.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2003.tb00025.x
  19. Tarle Z, Meniga A, Knezevic A, Sutalo J, Ristic M, Pichler G, et al. Composite conversion and temperature rise using a conventional,plasma arc, and an experimental blue LED curing unit. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29: 662-7. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00866.x
  20. Hofmann N, Hugo B, Schubert K, Klaiber B. Comparison between a plasma arc light source and conventional halogen curing units regarding flexural strength, modulus, and hardness of photoactivated resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:140-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840000063
  21. Corciolani G, Vichi A, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. The influence of tip geometry and distance on light-curing efficacy. Oper Dentist. 2008;33:325-31. https://doi.org/10.2341/07-94
  22. Mills RW. Blue light emitting diodes-another method of light curing? Br Dent J 1995;178:169 Letter
    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808693
  23. Tüloglu N, Ozer S, Tunç N, Canbaz S, Bayrak S. Knowledge and attitudes of dental clinicians regarding light-curing units in northern turkey. Clin Dent Res 2016: 40:26-34
  24. Santini A, Turner S. General dental practitioners’ knowledge of polymerisation of resin-based composite restorations and light curing unit technology. Briti Dent J. 2011;211:E13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.768
  25. Madhusudhana K, Swathi TV, Suneelkumar C, Lavanya A. A clinical survey of the output intensity of light curing units in dental offices across Nellore urban area. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2016;7:64-68 https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-433X.182657
  26. Aguiar FH, Braceiro A, Lima DA, Ambrosano GM, Lovadino JR. Effect of light curing modes and light curing time on the microhardness of a hybrid composite resin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:1-8. https://doi.org/10.5005/jcdp-8-6-1
  27. Yazici AR, Celik C, Dayangac B, Ozgunaltay G. Effects of different light curing units/modes on the microleakage of flowable composite resins. Europ J Dentist. 2008;2:240-46 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1697387
  28. Price RB, Shortall AC, Palin WM. Contemporary issues in light curing. Oper Dentist. 2014;39:4-14. https://doi.org/10.2341/13-067-LIT
  29. Barghi N, Berry T, Hatton C. Evaluating intensity output of curing lights in private dental offices. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125:992-96. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0204
  30. Jadhav S, Hegde V, Aher G, Fajandar N. Influence of light curing units on failure of direct composite restorations. J Cons Dent 2011;14:225-27. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.85793
  31. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW Jr. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Oper Dent 1994;19:26-32
  32. Bansal R, Hora BS, Kumar A, Bansal M, Gupta C, Singla S. Are we doing justice? A clinical survey of the output intensity of light curing units in dental offices. Int J Dent Sci 2012;4:9-11
  33. Fan PL, Schumacher RM, Azzolin K, Geary R, Eichmiller FC. Curing-light intensity and depth of cure of resin-based composites tested according to international standards. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133:429-34. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0200

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Biology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College.
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Jinnah Sindh Medical University.
  3. Senior Lecturer, Department of Dental Materials, Bahria University Medical and Dental College.
  4. Lecturer, Department of Oral Biology, Bahria University Medical and Dental College.
    Corresponding author: “Dr. Beenish Fatima Alam” < nish_alam@yahoo.com >

Knowledge of Pakistani Dentist Towards Light Curing Units- A Cross Sectional Analysis

Beenish Fatima Alam                                    BDS, MSc, MFDS RCS(Ed)

Talha Nayab                                                   BDS, MSc

Arqam Najmi                                                  BDS, MSc

Umaima Khan                                                BDS

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of knowledge of dentists working in a teaching hospital of Karachi regarding light cure units.
METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional study was conducted over a time frame of 6 months. A questionnaire was distributed to dentists working in a dental teaching hospital. Survey employed in this study has been adopted and revised from the study lead by Tüloglu et al. Questionnaire focused on the demographic details along with queries related to usage of light cure devices, type of light cure unit used, curing time used for composites and adhesive, light intensity used for sufficient polymerization. Statistical analysis of the study was done using Chi square and Fishers Exact and descriptive analysis done by analyzing frequency and percentage.
RESULT: Over-all 156 dentists participated in this study, which includes 34% (n= 53) males and 66% (n= 103) females participated. Light-emitting diode (LED) was commonly preferred by 66% of the respondents aged 21-29 years, followed by Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH). 34% of the dentists of age group 30-39 years had knowledge concerning options for irradiation accessible by Light Curing Units (LCU). Conventional mode was most preferred by 60% of 21-29 aged respondents. Majority of dentists advocated using 10-20 sec for curing adhesive and composite restorations. 66% of respondents aged commented using 100-300 mv/cm2 intensity of light , while 30-39 years aged used 300-500 mv/cm2 for curing 2 mm thick composite.
CONCLUSION: It is apparent that dental practitioners of age group of 21-29 years have less knowledge regarding dental light-curing units, concerning the technical knowledge and correct usage of light curing device.
KEYWORDS: Light-emitting diode, light intensity, Quartz-Tungsten-Halogen (QTH), dentists, composites.
HOW TO CITE: Alam BF, Nayab T, Najmi A, Khan U. Knowledge of Pakistani dentist towards light curing units- a cross sectional analysis. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):81-86.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.81
Received: 11September 2019, Accepted: 10 February 2020

Download PDF

Changes in Candidal Count Following Provision of Complete Denture

Momina Akram                                                  BDS, FCPS

Muhammad Waseem Ullah Khan                    BDS, FCPS

Sabiha Naeem                                                   BDS

OBJECTIVE: Candida associated denture stomatitis is the most common oral disease in denture wearers. The density of Candida in individuals using prosthesis is very important in terms of infection development. As denture stomatitis is a multifactorial disease, so denture wearing, along with many other factors, involves in the changes of candidal count. Determine the candidal count after providing the patients with complete dentures as quantification of candidal count is helpful in differentiating between colonization and infection.
METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted in Department of Prosthodontics, Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore. 155 edentulous patients visiting the Prosthodontic department were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Before insertion of complete dentures, oral sample were taken using the oral rinse technique. The sample was inoculated on Sabouraud’s agar, and incubated at 220C for 48 hrs. The number of colonies characteristic of Candida was counted. Denture hygiene instructions given. The patients were recalled after three months and the same oral sampling and culture technique were employed.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients that were included in the study was 57.97 ±4.99 years. In this study majority of the patients were male and constituted almost 80% of the sample population. The mean colony forming units before provision of complete dentures were 19.75 with a standard deviation of 12.30, this is considerably less than colony forming units after provision of complete dentures which was 165.37 with a standard deviation of 73.85.
CONCLUSION: Denture wearing with meticulous oral hygiene in elderly individuals is of great concern in controlling candidal growth. Denture removal at night is recommended to help in eliminating the source of the infectious agent.
KEYWORDS: Candida, Denture Stomatitis, Culture Technique, Colony Forming Units.
HOW TO CITE: Akram M, Khan MWU, Naeem S. Changes in candidal count following provision of complete denture. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):77-80.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.77
Received: 06 August 2019, Accepted: 13 January 2020

INTRODUCTION

Oral mucosal inflammation occurs in subjects carrying removable prosthesis and its most commonly diagnosed as Candida-associated denture stomatitis.1 Candida albicans is considered as the principle causative agent. Almost 60-70% of all complete denture wearers have denture stomatitis.2
Candidiasis is mainly manifested as a biofilm formation on the surfaces of prosthesis in which Candida is the main culprit. Residual microorganisms and debris accumulate on the irregular surface of the prosthesis even if it is cleaned thoroughly thus result in the continuous re-infection of the palate.3
After wearing prosthetic appliances, mucosal damage occurs due to two main reasons i.e. Candidal colonization and proteinase secretion by the organisms (filamentous form). Factors such as biofilm formation and its adhesion on the surface of prosthesis, dimorphism, enzymes secretion i.e. proteinases and phospholipases, convert the Candida
species into an effective pathogen.4
Other factors involve in its pathogenicity are AIDS, diabetes mellitus, head-neck cancer radiation therapy implementation, long-term antibiotic or corticosteroid use or nutritional disorders. Adhesion of Candida albicans occurs to acrylic surfaces of prosthesis and epithelial buccal cells than any other surfaces.5,6 Use of complete dentures can also result in erythematous oral candidiasis. It is a pathological fungal condition manifested as reddish lesions with an atrophic appearance, it can be asymptomatic or symptomatic. In symptomatic condition, it is associated with mild burning sensation.7
This study is being conducted to determine the candidal count after providing the patients with complete dentures as quantification of candidal count is helpful in differentiating between colonization and infection. Appropriate denture
management is important in controlling pathogenicity of Candida to promote general health.

METHODOLGY

This study was conducted in Department of Prosthodontics, Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore. One hundred and fifty-five edentulous patients visiting the Prosthodontic department were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria by Non-Probability, Consecutive Sampling.
Inclusion Criteria:

  • New complete denture wearers.
  • Healthy mucosa.
  • Age > 50 years.
  • Patient being edentulous for 06 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetics.
  • Smokers.
  • Chemotherapy & radiotherapy patients
  • History of broad-spectrum antibiotics or steroid therapy in the past six months.
  • Immunocompromised patients.

Informed written consent of the patient was taken after detailed verbal explanation of purpose, procedure, risk and
the benefit to them. Before insertion of complete dentures oral sample were taken using the oral rinse technique. (patient was asked to take a sip of distilled water, rinse for 30 sec and spit) The sample was injected on Sabouraud’s agar, and incubated at 220C for 48 hrs. The number of Candidal colonies was counted. Colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter were calculated (candidal counts > 400 CFU/ml were predictive of oral candidiasis). Germ tube tests were conducted to confirm the presence of Candida gram staining. Patients were provided with complete dentures. Minor adjustments of the denture were done if required. After the insertion, patients were instructed about denture hygiene verbally and written instructions were also given. Denture hygiene instructions were how to brush before sleep and after meals.
The patients were recalled after three months and the same oral sampling and culture technique were employed.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data was analyzed through SPSS (version 10.0) software. The variables under study were age, gender and CFU
(candidal colony forming units). Paired sample t-test was used to compare the candidal count before and after provision of complete dentures. P- value > 0.05 was significant.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients that were included in the study was
57.97 ±4.99 years (Figure 1). In this study out of 155 patients 123 were male and constituted almost 80% of the sample

Figure 1: Mean Age of the Patients

Table 1: Gender of the Patients

Table 2: Mean values for Cfu before & Cfu after the provision of Complete Dentures. Cfu; Colony Forming Units

Table 3: Comparison between Colony Forming Units (CFU) before and after provision of Complete Dentures

population. In contrast only 32 females were part of the study and just made 20.6% of whole sample (Table 1). Out of 155 patients, colony forming units exist in oral cavity before wearing dentures and fall in the range of 7-115. While after 3 months use of denture the range was 39-394 (Table 2).
The mean colony forming units before provision of complete dentures were 19.75 with a standard deviation of 12.30, this is considerably less than colony forming units after provision of complete dentures which was 165.37 with a standard deviation of 73.85 (Table 3). Candidal count increased in all 155 patients after wearing of complete dentures for three months, however this increase did not exceed the cutt off value 400 CFU/ml to be declared as candidiasis.
Paired sample T-test was used to compare the candidal count before and after provision of complete dentures to the
completely edentulous patients. The standard deviation was 68.76 and the standard error mean was 5.52, the confidence interval was kept at 95%. P- value was less than 0.05 indicating there was a significant difference between
the colony forming units before and after provision of complete dentures. This clearly indicates that there was significant rise in colony forming units after provision of complete dentures to the sample population.

DISCUSSION

Candida albicans, a microorganism exists in the oral floral community of healthy individuals either dentulous or edentulous. The oral cavity is a main reservoir which facilitates the colonization and spread of infection to systemic organs by pathogenic microorganisms. Oral candidiasis is developed due to the colonization of Candida species in
response to long-term use of prosthesis. The density ofCandida in denture wearers is very important factor in infection development. To specify the pathogenic species is important to start the proper treatment. Aging causes
progressive increase in Candidal count in the oral cavity.7
The sole purpose of this study was to establish whether the wearing of dentures in the elderly patients results in increase in candidal count and whether that increase in candidal count is significant enough to be labeled as candidiasis. To provide reliable assessments to oral health, it is mandatory to account the stable and constant factor of denture wearing with its effects, which helps in observing the age or other data (in isolation) in quite easier way. Various species of yeasts have been implicated in the colonization of the oral cavity.8
However, studies have revealed that in patients with denture induced stomatitis, 62.1% of the isolated yeast belonged to Candida albicans species. Budtz-Jorgensen et al. (1975) and Makila and Hopsu-Havu (1977), both conducted their studies on denture wearers and demonstrated a high prevalence of yeasts in their sample population.
Significant increase in candidal count even though statistically significant, however, was not sufficient enough to be labeled as candidiasis or candidal associated denture stomatitis. This is because cut-off point i.e. Candida counts >400 CFU/mL of unstimulated saliva turns to 2Æ6 after logarithmic transformation are predictive of oral candidiasis.9
In present study as well the cut off limit of 400 CFU/ml was used to define candidiasis. In this study the candidal count increased in all the 155 patients after provision and wearing of complete dentures for three months, however the increase in candidal count did not exceed the cut off limit of 400 CFU/m.1
Continuous denture wearing appears to facilitate the growth of species such as Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, and Candida glabrata.1
Oral candidiasis is widely reported in elderly denture wearers.7,10 Several factors that govern the presence of C.albicans in the oral cavity are immunocompromised conditions e.g diabetes mellitus, AIDS, implementation of radiation therapy, nutritional disorders etc, and wearing dentures, long term antibiotic or steroid use, elderly people etc. It was for this reason that in this study we kept all the other factors constant and evaluated the effect of denture wearing on candidal count. Patients with any kind of systemic illnesses or condition that can modify the candidal count in the oral cavity were not included in the study and at the same time a specific age group was defined in which this study was conducted to minimize the effect that age can have in modifying the candidal count in the oral cavity. Schulman et al, reported that individuals wearing complete dentures for longer periods exhibited a higher candidal count as compared to people who used dentures for shorter periods and followed dentist’s instructions for denture removal especially instructions regarding night time removal. According to Ikebe et al. if age, gender and drug intake are considered as controlling factors, then maxillary complete denture use is the only significant factor linked with candidal colonization in adults over 60 years.11
Salivary flow rate was not quantified in this study that was one of its limitations. As an overall assessment modality, saliva cultures are reliable. The errors in count was lessened by taking the sampling at the same time for every examination. Although continuous denture wearing was significant in Candida CFU counts but the denture-wearing habit alone is not enough to predispose the oral mucosa to the candidal infections. Various other factors are also involved in the fluctuations of Candida CFU counts such as age, gender, systemic heath, medications, quality and hygiene of the dentures and diet.8
In partial prosthesis users, severity of denture stomatitis is less as compare to complete denture wearers and fixed prosthesis users. This change in severity of disease is due to the change in the materials of prosthesis. As C.albicans is more adherent to acrylic surfaces and mucosa as compare to other surfaces. In fixed prosthesis mild stomatitis occurs because of the absence of acrylic material and also no mucosal contact exists.12.13 This study suggests that the candidal count increases after continuous denture wear and it is assessed as an important factor to predispose candidal infection. Thus, denture removal at night is advisable to eliminate the source of the pathogenicity and
to maintain immaculate oral hygiene so as to minimize the risk of candidiasis in complete denture patients.

CONCLUSION

While giving oral hygiene guidance to the middle-aged patients, denture wearing habits must be considered as a
significant factor. In elderly individuals, systemic heath is of utmost concern. Appropriate denture management is
mandatory to promote general health by controlling Candidal colonization. In immunocompromised patients, Candidal colonization due to denture wearing is detrimental to patient’s health. Microorganisms are entrapped in the irregular surface of acrylic resin especially Candida albicans. Therefore, to control the spread of candidal infection in risk patients who wear prostheses, immunosuppression is of critical importance.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no conflicts of interest.

SOURCE OF FUNDS

There are no sources of funds involved in this study.

REFERENCES

  1. Petrovic SM, Barac M, Pficer JK, Radunovic M, Jotic A, Pucar A. Presence of Different Candida Species at Denture Wearers with Type 2 Diabetes and Clinically Healthy Oral Mucosa-Pilot Study. Balk J Dent Med 2018;22:15-21. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjdm-2018-0003
  2. Salerno C, Pascale M, Contaldo M, Esposito V, Busciolano M, Milillo L, Guida A, Petruzzi M, Serpico R. Candida-associated denture stomatitis. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;16:139-43. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e139
  3. Prakash B, Shekar M, Maiti B, Karunasagar I, Padiyath S. Prevalence of Candida spp. among healthy denture and nondenture wearers with respect to hygiene and age. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2015;15:29-32. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.164912
  4. Gleiznys A, Zdanaviciene E, Žilinskas J. Candida albicans importance to denture wearers. A literature review. Stomatologija 2015;17:54-66.
  5. Niaz A, Nayyer S. Candida albicans myocardial abscess. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003:456-58.
  6. Lyu X, Zhao C, Yan ZM, Hua H. Efficacy of nystatin for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Dev Ther 2016;10:1161-171. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S100795
  7. Cankovic M, Bokor-Bratic M, Marinoski J, Stojanovic D. Prevalence and possible predictors of the occurrence of denture stomatitis in patients older than 60 years. Vojnosanitetski pregl 2017;74:311-16. https://doi.org/10.2298/VSP150104185C
  8. Freitas JB, Gomez RS, De Abreu MH, Ferreira e Ferreira E. Relationship between the use of full dentures and mucosal alterations among elderly Brazilians. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:370-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01782.x
  9. Marcos-Arias C, Eraso E, Madariaga L, Aguirre JM, Quindós G. Phospholipase and proteinase activities of Candida isolates from denture wearers. Mycoses 2011;54:10-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2009.01812.x
  10. Dagistan S, Aktas AE, Caglayan F, Ayyildiz A, Bilge M. Differential diagnosis of denture-induced stomatitis, Candida, and their variations in patients using complete denture: a clinical and mycological study. Mycoses 2009;52:266-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0507.2008.01592.x
  11. Pires-Gonçalves RH, Miranda ET, Baeza LC, Matsumoto MT, Zaia JE, Mendes-Giannini MJ. Genetic relatedness of commensal strains of Candida albicans carried in the oral cavity of patients’ dental prosthesis users in Brazil. Mycopathologia 2007;164:255-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9052-5
  12. White PL, Williams DW, Kuriyama T, Samad SA, Lewis MA, Barnes RA. Detection of candida in concentrated oral rinse cultures by real-time PCR. J Clin Micobiol 2004;42:2101-07. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.42.5.2101-2107.2004
  13. Pires FR, Santos EB, Bonan PR, De Ameida OP, Lopez MA. Denture stomatitis and salivary candida in Brazilian edentulous patients. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:115-19. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00947.x

  1. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
  2. Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
  3. FCPS Resident, Department of Prosthodontics, deMontmorency College of Dentistry Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore.
    Corresponding author: “Dr. Sabiha Naeem” < cute_sabi85@yahoo.com >

Changes in Candidal Count Following Provision of Complete Denture

Momina Akram                                                  BDS, FCPS

Muhammad Waseem Ullah Khan                    BDS, FCPS

Sabiha Naeem                                                   BDS

OBJECTIVE: Candida associated denture stomatitis is the most common oral disease in denture wearers. The density of Candida in individuals using prosthesis is very important in terms of infection development. As denture stomatitis is a multifactorial disease, so denture wearing, along with many other factors, involves in the changes of candidal count. Determine the candidal count after providing the patients with complete dentures as quantification of candidal count is helpful in differentiating between colonization and infection.
METHODOLOGY: This study was conducted in Department of Prosthodontics, Punjab Dental Hospital, Lahore. 155 edentulous patients visiting the Prosthodontic department were selected on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Before insertion of complete dentures, oral sample were taken using the oral rinse technique. The sample was inoculated on Sabouraud’s agar, and incubated at 220C for 48 hrs. The number of colonies characteristic of Candida was counted. Denture hygiene instructions given. The patients were recalled after three months and the same oral sampling and culture technique were employed.
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients that were included in the study was 57.97 ±4.99 years. In this study majority of the patients were male and constituted almost 80% of the sample population. The mean colony forming units before provision of complete dentures were 19.75 with a standard deviation of 12.30, this is considerably less than colony forming units after provision of complete dentures which was 165.37 with a standard deviation of 73.85.
CONCLUSION: Denture wearing with meticulous oral hygiene in elderly individuals is of great concern in controlling candidal growth. Denture removal at night is recommended to help in eliminating the source of the infectious agent.
KEYWORDS: Candida, Denture Stomatitis, Culture Technique, Colony Forming Units.
HOW TO CITE: Akram M, Khan MWU, Naeem S. Changes in candidal count following provision of complete denture. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):77-80.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.77
Received: 06 August 2019, Accepted: 13 January 2020

Download PDF

Knowledge and Practices of Patients Regarding Antibiotics Used For Dental Problems

Amna Sohail               BDS, BSc

Azka Yaseen               BDS, BSc, PDAGD

Samir Riaz Qazi        BDS, FFDRCSI, M.Phil

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this survey was to assess the level of common knowledge and practices concerning usage of antibiotics among dental patients.
METHODOLOGY: A descriptive questionnaire-based survey was done consisting of fifteen questions at the Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College.
RESULTS: Sample included 500 dental patients, 237 males (48.2%) and 255 females (51.8%). Participants were divided into various groups; less educated (up to matriculation level), more educated (above matriculation level), low-income (<25000 PKR monthly) and high-income (25000 PKR and above monthly).
Majority (61.8%) of the sample thought antibiotics have antiviral effects. Three-fourth (75.5%) of the sample thought antibiotics have an analgesic effect while (67.3%) thought antibiotics should be prescribed post-extraction.
Thirty-eight percent thought that antibiotics should be taken before any dental work while more than half (54.7%) knew that antibiotics have side effects. Majority (74.5%) knew that unnecessary use of antibiotics make them ineffective leading to antibiotic resistance. In the sample, (90.7%) believed it was important to complete the course of antibiotics prescribed by dentist but (43%) used to discontinue antibiotics on feeling better. Twenty six percent of the sample considered homeopathic medicine more effective than antibiotics for treatment of infections.
Self-medication was reported by (42.3%) and (41.1%) used antibiotics prescribed by pharmacists at some point in their lives.
CONCLUSION: Patients’ knowledge about antibiotics was inadequate, antibiotics misuse was widespread and high selfmedication rates were reported.
KEYWORDS: Antibiotics, Self-medication, Antimicrobial resistance, Patient, Knowledge, Dentistry.
HOW TO CITE: Sohail A, Yaseen A, Qazi SR. Knowledge and practices of patients regarding antibiotics used for dental problems. J Pak Dent Assoc 2020;29(2):71-76.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25301/JPDA.292.71
Received: 29 June 2019, Accepted: 28 February 2020

INTRODUCTION

Antibiotics are commonly used as well as misused drugs in the world, particularly in developing countries.1
In dentistry, there is evidence to suggest over-prescription of antibiotics by dental practitioners in the management of acute dental conditions, despite contrary clinical guidelines.2 This might be due to uncertainty about diagnosis, demand and expectations of patients, and because of the pressure of time on the clinician.3 Patient expectations increase the possibility of receiving a particular prescription by three times.4 Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing habits lead to the development of resistant bacterial strains.5 Centers for Disease Control US (CDC) estimates that at least 30% of oral antibiotic courses prescribed in the outpatient setting during 2010-11 were unnecessary.6
In an English study, general dental practitioners (GDPs) reported that their decisions in antibiotic prescribing were compelled by both clinical related pressures and wider responsibilities towards public health.7

Over the years, misuse of antibiotics has resulted in the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains which are
intensifying with time8 and caused death of around 23,000 people in US.9 Dentists in primary care make up approximately one in ten of all therapeutic antibiotic prescriptions, hence contributing to the problem of bacterial resistance.10
In addition to these inappropriate prescribing habits of doctors, self-medication or the use of un-prescribed drugs is common practice around the globe.11 Factors that lead to self-medication include high cost of medicines, inaccessibility to health facilities12, having minor illness, high health care costs, lack of adequate time to visit a physician, prior experience in using a drug, and long waiting time to visit a qualified practitioner.13,14
Self-medication with antibiotics ranges from 2% to 92% in different countries, with the most frequent self-medicated prescription-only medicine being antibiotics.15
In Pakistan, little research has been carried out in the past regarding antibiotics misuse by patients. By evidence the proportion of self-medicating individuals is alarmingly high.24 This problem has been related to illiteracy, ignorance, lack of legislation regarding the use of prescribed drugs, poor socioeconomic status, dental phobia, no health insurance, unavailability of quality dental clinics, and availability of homeopathic drugs.24 Prescription of medicines by nondoctors also contributes to the misuse of antibiotics.25 This study was aimed at examining common knowledge and practices concerning usage of antibiotics among dental patients. The findings of this study may, thus, help initiate effective interventions to decrease misconceptions about the antibiotics use in the region.

METHODOLOGY

A descriptive cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among patients presenting in Out-patient
Department (OPD) of Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College in order to assess their knowledge and practices concerning antibiotics and its resistance. Permission was sought from the IRB (4187/IOD/CMH) before carrying out the survey.
The questionnaire was translated into Urdu and retranslated back into English and modified as required. It was then piloted on 10 patients and revised again. The purpose of this study was discussed with participants, any ambiguities
cleared, and verbal consent was taken. Filled forms were collected immediately. The study included 500 respondents. All patients, age 13 and above, presenting in the OPD were included in the study. The mean age of respondents was 35.3 years (minimum age=13, maximum age=85, Table 1). There were 237 (48.2%) males and 255 (51.8%) females in the study (8 missing). The participants were divided into various groups such as; Less educated (up to matriculation level, 36.8%), More educated (above matriculation level, 63.2%), Low-income (<25000 PKR monthly, 40.1%) and Highincome (25000 PKR and above monthly, 59.5%) groups (Table 1). Data collected in this study was analyzed using IBM SPSS v23 (IBM Corp, USA, 2017). The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 500 respondents in this study. The mean age of respondents was 35.3 years (SD=13.3, median age=32, minimum age=13, maximum age=85, Table 1). There were 237 (48.2%) males and 255 (51.8%) females in the sample (8 missing). Participants were divided into various groups; Less educated (36.8%), More educated (63.2%), Low-income (40.1%) and High-income (59.5%) (Table 1). The most

Table 1: Demographics of study participants (missing: 8)

frequent occupation was housewife (36.2%) followed by private job (17.2%), and self-employed (9.2%).
In the study, a vast number (82.7%) of respondents were aware of the fact that antibiotics can kill bacteria. But majority (61.8%) of the sample thought antibiotics have antiviral effects despite of any gender, education or income group (P=0.050, Table 2). Three-fourth (75.5%) of the sample thought antibiotics have an analgesic effect. Significantly more of the less educated participants had this thought than more educated ones (81.8% vs. 71.8%, P=0.049, Table 2). Augmentin (32%) and Amoxil (24%) were the most commonly misused antibiotics for pain relief.
A large number (67.3%) of the respondents were of the view that dentists should prescribe antibiotics post-extraction
where majority of the respondents were from low income group (78.3%) and seem to be unaware about the role of
antibiotics after extraction of tooth/teeth (Table 2). Comparatively lesser number of respondents (38%) were of
the opinion that antibiotics should be taken before going for any dental work which included significantly high number of females as compared to males (43.2% vs 32.3%, P=0.048) and low income group as compared to high income group (43% vs 30.2%, P=0.021) (Table 2).
More than half (52.8%) of the sample thought that antibiotics can cause allergic reactions including (54.2%) of more educated people (Table 2). While (54.7%) thought that antibiotics can have side effects such as diarrhea. Significantly high difference was seen among more educated people with high income as compared to less educated people with low income (58.8% vs 47.5%, P=0.052 and 59.8% vs 47.1%, P=0.021 respectively, Table 2).

Majority (74.5%) of the sample knew that unnecessary use of antibiotics can make them ineffective leading to antibiotic resistance. Significantly high frequency of the more educated and high income groups were aware of this phenomenon as compared to less educated and low income groups (79.7% vs 65.4%, P=0.002 and 79.8% vs 69.2%,
p=0.028 respectively, Table 2).
In the sample, a vast number (90.7%) of respondents, despite of any gender, education or income group, were aware about the importance of completing the course of antibiotics prescribed by dentist (Table 2). But (43%) of the sample used to discontinue further antibiotics on feeling better before completion of course (Table 3). Twenty six percent of the sample considered homeopathic medicine to be more effective than antibiotics for treatment of infections, with significantly more participants of less
educated and low income groups as compared to the
participants of more educated and more income groups
(34.4% vs 21.3%, P=0.004 and 30.5% vs 13.6%, P=0.000
respectively, (Table 2). This depicts the low level of awareness
among low socio-economic groups.
In the sample, (41.0%) of respondents told that they
used to give the leftover antibiotics to their friends, roommates
or family members if they were ever asked for (Table 3).
This practice led to self-medication which was reported by
(42.3%) of the total respondents (Table 3).
In the study, (41.1%) of participants had used antibiotics
prescribed by pharmacists at some point in their lives,
including significantly high number of males as compared
to females (46.4% vs 35.9%, P=0.016), as well as more

Table 2: Frequency of respondents agreeing with research statements related to knowledge about antibiotics.
* indicates significant differences amongst groups.

Table 3: Frequency of respondents agreeing with research statements related to practices about antibiotics.
* indicates significant differences amongst groups.

educated and high income groups as compared to less
educated and low income groups (44.2% vs 35.5%, P=0.000

and 46.7% vs 38.3% respectively, Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Antibiotic misuse was prevalent in the sample evidenced
by the high self-medication rates (42.3%) and the use of
pharmacist-prescribed antibiotics (41.1%). The
misconceptions that antibiotics had antiviral (61.8%) and
analgesic effect (75.5%), should be taken before any dental
work (38%), and should be prescribed post-extraction
(67.3%) were widespread. This might be due to inadequate
knowledge regarding appropriate antibiotic usage and due
to the unregulated dispensation of these drugs by pharmacies.
Self-medication rates (42.3%) in the study were
comparatively lower than those in the region: 92% in
Kuwait18, (51%) in India19, (53%) in Iran20 and (48%) in
Sudan, where (76%) antibiotics were pharmacist-prescribed
and (24%) were obtained from friends, family, or at home.21
In the US, however, the rate of self-medication is considerably
lower (5%).22
Misconception about antiviral effects of antibiotics was
(61.8%) in the study and most (75.5%) of the respondents
thought antibiotics had analgesic effect. A Swedish study
showed that (19.1%) agreed that common colds are cured
with antibiotics23, (6.5%) in Netherlands24 and (7.4%) in
Australia25 had similar views, but considerably lower than
what has been reported from Britain (38%)26, and the USA
(55%).27,28 A Jordanian study showed (28.1%) individuals
misused antibiotics as analgesics.29 According to a systemic
review in 2015, (50%) of the sample were not aware that
antibiotics were not therapeutic for viral infections (such as
flu and common cold), pain, and inflammation.30
Majority of patients did not know that antibiotics can
only treat bacterial infections and that they are not useful
against viruses.31 Thus leaving them unaware about the fact
that misuse of antibiotics can lead to the problem of
developing bacterial resistance.32 In developed parts of the
world, such as Europe, attitudes towards antibiotics were
found to be influenced by country and level of education.33
It was also found that awareness about antibiotic resistance
was lagging in countries with higher prevalence of
resistance.33 In China, public, in general, was not aware of
the causes of antibiotic resistance, or their role and capability
in causing or preventing resistance.34
The perception that homeopathic medicine is superior
to antibiotics is of concern and indicates lack of trust in
allopathic medicine as (26%) of the study sample considered
homeopathic medicines were more effective than antibiotics
for treatment of infections.
Although the study had socioeconomically diverse
respondents but this may not represent the overall population
of Lahore. Because the limitation of this study was sample
size that comprised of patients from single private hospital
only. Respondents may also have denied self-medication or
using pharmacy-prescribed antibiotics, especially if aware
that this was inappropriate behavior.
Further research needs to be done on the misuse of
antibiotics in the region especially by dental patients and
their expectations from dentists for an antibiotic course
prescription possibly leading to inappropriate antibiotic
prescriptions by GDPs. A cohesive approach involving
policymakers, prescribers and the general public is needed,
using both educational and regulatory measures. Such
measures should be embedded in the general policy by the
government to change the culture of antibiotic use by
improving awareness among the general public and
professionals about the risks associated with antibiotic
misuse, as well as reducing public misconception about the
analgesic and antiviral effects of antibiotics.
Previous interventions that have successfully improved
prescribing behavior among GDPs include clinical audits35,36
and pharmacist-delivered academic detailing.37 GDPs need
to accurately and extensively inform their patients with the
intention of making them aware of the importance of correct
behavior regarding antibiotic intake.
CONCLUSION
High self-medication rates were reported in the sample
despite reasonable knowledge about antibiotic resistance
and its side effects. Antibiotic misuse was widespread in
the sample and may be linked to the misconception that
antibiotics have an antiviral and analgesic effect.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
None declared
REFERENCES
1. Ocan M, Obuku EA, Bwanga F, Akena D, Richard S, Ogwal-Okeng
J, Obua C. Household antimicrobial self-medication: a systematic
review and meta-analysis of the burden, risk factors and outcomes in
developing countries. BMC public health. 2015;15:742.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2109-3
2. Cope AL, Chestnutt IG. Inappropriate prescribing of antibiotics in
primary dental care: reasons and resolutions. Prim Dent J. 2014;3:
33-7.
https://doi.org/10.1308/205016814813877333
3. Butler CC, Rollnick S, Pill R, Maggs-Rapport F, Stott N.
Understanding the culture of prescribing: qualitative study of general
practitioners’ and patients’ perceptions of antibiotics for sore throats.

BMT. 1998;317:637-42.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7159.637
4. Murshid MA, Murshid MA, Mohaidin Z, Mohaidin Z, Yen Nee G,
Yen Nee G. The influence patient’s characteristics “requests and
expectations” on physician prescribing behavior: A review. Int J
Pharmaceut Healthcare Market. 2016;10:390-411.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPHM-01-2016-0010
5. Costelloe C, Metcalfe C, Lovering A, Mant D, Hay AD. Effect of
antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in
individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ.
2010;340:c2096.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c2096
6. Fleming-Dutra KE, Hersh AL, Shapiro DJ, Bartoces M, Enns EA,
File TM, et al. Prevalence of inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions
among US ambulatory care visits, 2010-2011. J Am Med Assoc.
2016;315:1864-873.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.4151
7. Cope A, Wood F, Francis NA, Chestnutt IG. General dental
practitioners’ perceptions of antimicrobial use and resistance: a
qualitative interview study. Brit Dent J. 2014;217:E9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.761
8. Goossens H, Ferech M, Vander Stichele R, Elseviers M, Group EP.
Outpatient antibiotic use in Europe and association with resistance:
a cross-national database study. The Lancet. 2005;365:579-87.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70799-6
9. Control center for diseases, Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats
in the United States, 2013: Centres for Disease Control and Prevention,
US Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.
10. Johnson TM, Hawkes J. Awareness of antibiotic prescribing and
resistance in primary dental care. Prim Dent J. 2014;3:44-7.
https://doi.org/10.1308/205016814813877324
11. Morgan DJ, Okeke IN, Laxminarayan R, Perencevich EN,
Weisenberg S. Non-prescription antimicrobial use worldwide: a
systematic review. The Lancet infectious diseases. 2011;11:692-701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70054-8
12. Silva IM, Catrib AMF, Matos VCd, Gondim APS. Self-medication
in adolescence: a challenge to health education. Ciência & Saúde
Coletiva. 2011;16:1651-60.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000700101
13. Shaghaghi A, Asadi M, Allahverdipour H. Predictors of selfmedication behavior: a systematic review. Iranian J Public Health.
2014;43:136.
14. Shankar P, Partha P, Shenoy N. Self-medication and non-doctor
prescription practices in Pokhara valley, Western Nepal: a questionnairebased study. BMC family practice. 2002;3:17.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-3-17
15. Shehnaz SI, Agarwal AK, Khan N. A systematic review of selfmedication practices among adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2014;55:467-
83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.07.001
16. Baig QA, Muzaffar D, Afaq A, Bilal S, Iqbal N. Prevalence
of self medication among dental patients. Pak Oral & Dent J. 2012;
32:292-95.
17. Zafar SN, Syed R, Waqar S, Irani FA, Saleem S. Prescription of
medicines by medical students of Karachi, Pakistan: A cross-sectional
study. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:162-68.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-8-162
18. Abahussain E, Matowe LK, Nicholls P. Self-reported medication
use among adolescents in Kuwait. Medi Principles Practi. 2005;14:161-
64.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000084633
19. Rawlani SM, Rawlani S, Bhowte R, Degwekar S, Rawlani S,
Chand0k R. Prevalence of self-medication among dental patients in
rural area of Maharashtra, India: A cross-sectional study. Indi J of Oral
Sci. 2015;6:51-4.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-6944.162637
20. Sarahroodi S, Arzi A. Self medication with antibiotics, is it a
problem among Iranian college students in Tehran. J Biol Sci.
2009;9:829-32.
https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2009.829.832
21. Awad A, Eltayeb I, Matowe L, Thalib L. Self-medication with
antibiotics and antimalarials in the community of Khartoum State,
Sudan. J Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 2005;8:326-31.
22. Zoorob R, Grigoryan L, Nash S, Trautner BW. Nonprescription
Antimicrobial Use in a Primary Care Population in the United States.
Antimicrob Agents Chemotherap. 2016;60:5527-532.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00528-16
23. André M, Vernby Å, Berg J, Lundborg CS. A survey of public
knowledge and awareness related to antibiotic use and resistance in
Sweden. J Antimicrob Chemotherap. 2010;65:1292-296.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkq104
24. Cals JW, Boumans D, Lardinois RJ, Gonzales R, Hopstaken RM,
Butler CC, et al. Public beliefs on antibiotics and respiratory tract
infections: an internet-based questionnaire study. Br J Gen Pract.
2007;57:942-47.
https://doi.org/10.3399/096016407782605027
25. Wutzke SE, Artist MA, Kehoe LA, Fletcher M, Mackson JM,
Weekes LM. Evaluation of a national programme to reduce inappropriate
use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections: effects on
consumer awareness, beliefs, attitudes and behaviour in Australia.
Health Promotion Int. 2006;22:53-64.
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dal034
26. Curry M, Sung L, Arroll B, et al. Public views and use of antibiotics
for the common cold before and after an education campaign New
Zealand, N Z Med J , 2006;119:1957

27. McNulty CA, Boyle P, Nichols T, Clappison P, Davey P. Don’t
wear me out-the public’s knowledge of and attitudes to antibiotic use.
J Antimicrob Chemotherap. 2007;59:727-38.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkl558
28. Belongia EA, Naimi TS, Gale CM, Besser RE. Antibiotic use and
upper respiratory infections: a survey of knowledge, attitudes, and
experience in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Prevent Medi. 2002;34:346-
52.
https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0992
29. Shehadeh M, Suaifan G, Darwish RM, Wazaify M, Zaru L, Alja’fari
S. Knowledge, attitudes and behavior regarding antibiotics use and
misuse among adults in the community of Jordan. A pilot study. Saudi
Pharmaceut J. 2012;20:125-33.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2011.11.005
30. Gualano MR, Gili R, Scaioli G, Bert F, Siliquini R. General
population’s knowledge and attitudes about antibiotics: a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety. 2015;24:2-
10.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3716
31. Oh AL, Hassali MA, Al-Haddad MS, Sulaiman SAS, Shafie AA,
Awaisu A. Public knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic usage:
a cross-sectional study among the general public in the state of Penang,
Malaysia. J Infect Develop Countri. 2011;5:338-47.
https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.1502
32. Grigoryan L, Burgerhof JG, Degener JE, Deschepper R, Lundborg
CS, Monnet DL, et al. Attitudes, beliefs and knowledge concerning
antibiotic use and self-medication: a comparative European study.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Safety. 2007;16:1234-243.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1479
33. Pan H, Cui B, Zhang D, Farrar J, Law F, Ba-Thein W. Prior
knowledge, older age, and higher allowance are risk factors for selfmedication with antibiotics among university students in southern
China. PloS one. 2012;7:e41314.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041314
34. Chate R, White S, Hale L, Howat A, Bottomley J, Barnet-Lamb
J, et al. The impact of clinical audit on antibiotic prescribing in general
dental practice. Briti Dent J. 2006;201:635.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4814261
35. Palmer N, Dailey Y, Martin M. Pharmacology: Can audit improve
antibiotic prescribing in general dental practice? Briti Dent J.
2001;191:253.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801156
36. Seager J, Howell-Jones R, Dunstan F, Lewis M, Richmond S,
Thomas D. A randomised controlled trial of clinical outreach education
to rationalise antibiotic prescribing for acute dental pain in the primary
care setting. Briti Dent J. 2006;201:217.
https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4813879


  1. Demonstrator, Department of Prosthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College.
  2. General Dentist, Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College.
  3. Oral Surgeon, , Institute of Dentistry, CMH Lahore Medical College.
    Corresponding author: “Dr. Azka Yaseen” < dentalresearch2016@gmail.com >